Travel News

Flight Attendants Oppose CDC’s Decision to Shorten Quarantine Period

Association of Flight Attendants is against the CDC’s decision to loosen quarantine rules for those who will test positive for COVID19. The union’s president Sara Nelson said  “We said we wanted to hear from medical professionals on the best guidance for quarantine, not from corporate America advocating for a shortened period due to staffing shortages”.

Nelson questioned the CDC’s medical explanation that aligns with the number of days pushed by corporations.

Under the new guidelines, people who tested positive but with no symptoms can isolate for five days instead of ten. They also don’t need to test negative to end the isolation period. However, they should wear masks for the next five days.

CDC’s Decision Influenced By Corporations?

Days before shortening the quarantine period, the agency received letters from the airline industry. The airline industry lobbied for a 5-day quarantine period. According to the requests, a 10-day isolation requirement can “exacerbate personnel shortages and create significant disruptions”.

True enough, airlines had to cancel flights during the busy holiday travel season since workers are calling sick.

Delta Air Lines was the first carrier to request a five-day quarantine period. Delta claims that a 10-day quarantine period “was developed in 2020″. And it was made “when the pandemic was in different phase without effective vaccines and treatments”. After Delta Air Lines, JetBlue sent a separate request to the CDC. Then, Airlines for America asked the agency to shorten the quarantine period to just 5 days.

According to the CDC, the change was “motivated by science demonstrating that the majority of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs early in the course of illness, generally in the 1-2 days prior to onset of symptoms and the 2-3 days after”.

In NBC’s Nightly News, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s top infectious disease expert said that “If you look at the chance of getting a transmission in that second half of that 10-day period, it’s considerably less than in those first few days”. He added: “so on balance, if you look at the safety of the public and the need to have a society not disrupted, this was a good choice”.

John Michael Jayme

John Michael Jayme is a Travel Analyst for The Jet Set. He writes about news and events affecting the travel industry.

Recent Posts

FAA Orders Inspections of Boeing 737 Max Jets for Fuselage Cracks

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has ordered inspections of Boeing 737 Max jets for…

2 days ago

Delta Air Lines Returning to Tokyo Narita After 7 Years

Delta Air Lines will restore nonstop service between Seattle and Tokyo Narita in March 2027,…

3 days ago

Late-Summer Travel: From Cool Mountain Destinations to Hot Caribbean Deals

With the busy Fourth of July travel rush behind us and the summer season beginning…

4 days ago

Alaska Airlines Removes Influencer Christian Evangelist After She Preaches in the Aisle

Alaska Airlines removed an influencer Christian evangelist from one of its flights for safety reasons…

5 days ago

Lo «cool» es la nueva tendencia: los turistas acuden en masa a destinos fuera de temporada alta.

Cada vez más viajeros están cambiando las playas soleadas por el aire fresco y escapadas…

5 days ago

SFO contempla una terminal VIP exclusiva para viajeros adinerados.

El Aeropuerto Internacional de San Francisco (SFO) planea habilitar una terminal VIP para viajeros de…

5 days ago