Travel News

Flight Attendants Oppose CDC’s Decision to Shorten Quarantine Period

Association of Flight Attendants is against the CDC’s decision to loosen quarantine rules for those who will test positive for COVID19. The union’s president Sara Nelson said  “We said we wanted to hear from medical professionals on the best guidance for quarantine, not from corporate America advocating for a shortened period due to staffing shortages”.

Nelson questioned the CDC’s medical explanation that aligns with the number of days pushed by corporations.

Under the new guidelines, people who tested positive but with no symptoms can isolate for five days instead of ten. They also don’t need to test negative to end the isolation period. However, they should wear masks for the next five days.

CDC’s Decision Influenced By Corporations?

Days before shortening the quarantine period, the agency received letters from the airline industry. The airline industry lobbied for a 5-day quarantine period. According to the requests, a 10-day isolation requirement can “exacerbate personnel shortages and create significant disruptions”.

True enough, airlines had to cancel flights during the busy holiday travel season since workers are calling sick.

Delta Air Lines was the first carrier to request a five-day quarantine period. Delta claims that a 10-day quarantine period “was developed in 2020″. And it was made “when the pandemic was in different phase without effective vaccines and treatments”. After Delta Air Lines, JetBlue sent a separate request to the CDC. Then, Airlines for America asked the agency to shorten the quarantine period to just 5 days.

According to the CDC, the change was “motivated by science demonstrating that the majority of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs early in the course of illness, generally in the 1-2 days prior to onset of symptoms and the 2-3 days after”.

In NBC’s Nightly News, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s top infectious disease expert said that “If you look at the chance of getting a transmission in that second half of that 10-day period, it’s considerably less than in those first few days”. He added: “so on balance, if you look at the safety of the public and the need to have a society not disrupted, this was a good choice”.

John Michael Jayme

John Michael Jayme is a Travel Analyst for The Jet Set. He writes about news and events affecting the travel industry.

Recent Posts

United Offers Free Flight Changes Amid Passenger Boycott of Trump Airport

United Airlines is preparing for a passenger boycott of President Donald J. Trump International Airport.…

3 hours ago

July Fourth Gatherings With Celebrity Chef Jamie Gwen

With backyard entertaining, holiday festivities, and family gatherings in full swing.

3 days ago

SFO Eyes Exclusive VIP Terminal for Wealthy Travelers

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is planning to introduce a VIP terminal for affluent travelers.…

5 days ago

Delta: Airfares Remain High Despite Falling Jet Fuel Prices

Delta Air Lines said Friday that airfares are likely to remain elevated despite falling jet…

6 days ago

JetBlue Expands Fort Lauderdale Operations, Plans to Hire Former Spirit Employees

After the collapse of Spirit Airlines, JetBlue Airways has emerged as the top carrier at…

1 week ago

Cool Summer Tech

The World Cup isn't the only thing heating up this summer.

2 weeks ago